Search
There are 4 results.
Tag
Tag
All (26)
Activities (1)
Analytics (1)
Assessments (2)
Asynchrony (3)
Authentic Activities (1)
Backwards Design (1)
Canvas (2)
Case Studies (1)
Collaboration (3)
Communication (4)
Community (2)
Content Delivery (1)
Copyright (1)
Course Preparation (3)
Discussions (2)
Diversity (1)
Equity (1)
Faculty Presence (1)
Feedback (2)
Formative Assessments (2)
Learning Objectives (3)
Multimodality (4)
Qualitative courses (1)
Quantitative courses (1)
Rubrics (1)
Summative Assessments (1)
Synchrony (4)
Third-Party Tools (2)
Format
Instructor Presence in Online Courses
Consistent and meaningful instructor presence is one of the most important drivers of student success and satisfaction in online courses (Roddy et al., 2017). However, establishing instructor presence online can be challenging. In fact, studies have shown that many online students feel their instructors are largely invisible (Tichavsky et al., 2015).
Easy and Essential Online Course Elements
Transferring your course online opens a world of possibilities. In fact, you might be tempted to spend hours trying to locate and learn new educational technologies, or to rebuild your entire course in the learning management system (LMS). But while effective use of technology can certainly enhance learning experiences, it can also introduce obstacles for both faculty and students.
Encouraging Effective Discussions
Online forums are valuable learning tools: they merit the time and thought it takes to create them, but they must be well-designed to be effective for instructors and students. Baker and Ahlegren (2022) note that instructors may start out with the best of intentions and a desire to achieve multiple goals, such as promoting critical thinking and fostering a community of authentic learners. However, discussion boards often become just another writing assignment, a missed opportunity to “elicit debate, inspire meaningful ideas, and fully engage . . . learner[s]” (Blakely et al., 2022, p. 3). When this happens, students can view discussions as transactional, not transformative (p. 3).